PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVLIX vs. JLKUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVLIX achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than JLKUX's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, JVLIX has outperformed JLKUX with an annualized return of 13.14%, while JLKUX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.01% annualized return.


JVLIX

1D
-1.37%
1M
4.15%
YTD
16.83%
6M
15.11%
1Y
30.56%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
13.14%

JLKUX

1D
-2.19%
1M
0.41%
YTD
10.81%
6M
4.83%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
16.83%17.48%15.59%13.91%-4.45%29.92%1.59%22.70%-9.75%17.97%
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
10.81%12.97%15.52%18.68%-19.64%15.82%20.34%24.86%-8.96%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JVLIX and JLKUX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.86

The correlation between JVLIX and JLKUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVLIX vs. JLKUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVLIX
JVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKUX
JLKUX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JLKUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) and John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JVLIXJLKUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.15

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.83

8.25

+8.58

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the JLKUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVLIX and JLKUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVLIX drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, which is greater than JLKUX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVLIX and JLKUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVLIXJLKUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.12%

-32.07%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-9.86%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.48%

-16.88%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-28.12%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.33%

-32.07%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.32%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-5.28%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.44%

-0.55%

Volatility

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) is 5.23%, while John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that JVLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVLIXJLKUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

6.01%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

12.63%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

15.06%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

16.39%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

16.53%

+2.38%

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVLIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKUX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVLIX vs. JLKUX - Dividend Comparison

JVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than JLKUX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
1.69%1.87%3.23%3.28%15.00%9.92%4.36%8.74%11.46%3.34%4.83%2.95%
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
5.68%6.64%13.97%7.22%7.16%14.63%1.57%5.87%10.59%4.60%1.22%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVLIX and JLKUX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLKUX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to JVLIX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVLIX dropped -59.12% vs JLKUX's -32.07%.

JVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVLIX and JLKUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer