JVLIX vs. JLBAX
JVLIX (John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund) and JLBAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio) are both mutual funds - JVLIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by John Hancock, while JLBAX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JVLIX returned 12.80%/yr vs 5.70%/yr for JLBAX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JVLIX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JLBAX.
Performance
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVLIX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than JLBAX's 4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JVLIX has outperformed JLBAX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while JLBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.70% annualized return.
JVLIX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 30.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.10%
JLBAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVLIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund | 18.28% | 17.48% | 15.59% | 13.91% | -4.45% | 29.92% | 1.59% | 22.70% | -9.75% | 17.97% |
JLBAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio | 4.45% | 11.60% | 6.41% | 10.55% | -13.60% | 8.28% | 11.56% | 15.93% | -4.97% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVLIX and JLBAX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JVLIX and JLBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVLIX vs. JLBAX — Risk / Return Rank
JVLIX
JLBAX
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JLBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JVLIX | JLBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.18 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 9.15 | +6.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVLIX drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, which is greater than JLBAX's maximum drawdown of -47.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVLIX and JLBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVLIX | JLBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.12% | -47.29% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -4.54% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -5.96% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -19.38% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.33% | -20.07% | -20.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.96% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -5.47% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JLBAX) at 1.71%. This indicates that JVLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVLIX | JLBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 1.71% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 5.07% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 5.92% | +7.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 7.43% | +9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 7.73% | +11.14% |
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVLIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than JLBAX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
JVLIX vs. JLBAX - Dividend Comparison
JVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than JLBAX's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLBAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio | 6.37% | 6.65% | 3.59% | 3.45% | 13.16% | 9.37% | 7.58% | 9.31% | 10.96% | 5.69% | 7.62% | 9.15% |
JVLIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund | 5.61% | 6.64% | 13.97% | 7.22% | 7.16% | 14.63% | 1.57% | 5.87% | 10.59% | 4.60% | 1.22% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVLIX and JLBAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JVLIX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to JLBAX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVLIX dropped -59.12% vs JLBAX's -47.29%.
JVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVLIX and JLBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer