PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUSA vs. TEXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUSA vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 18.06% return.


JUSA

1D
0.73%
1M
0.79%
6M
8.34%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.88%

TEXN

1D
0.65%
1M
0.01%
6M
10.53%
YTD
18.06%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.01M$13.36M$11.16M
$50.79K$59.93K$77.64K

JUSA vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and TEXN is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.59

The correlation between JUSA and TEXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUSA vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUSA
TEXN

Technology

38.4%
16.2%

Financial Services

11.5%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
3.2%

Industrials

8.6%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.2%

Energy

2.9%
36.3%

Utilities

2.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.9%

Technology

JUSA
38.4%
TEXN
16.2%

Financial Services

JUSA
11.5%
TEXN
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JUSA
10.3%
TEXN
9.9%

Communication Services

JUSA
9.8%
TEXN
3.4%

Healthcare

JUSA
8.9%
TEXN
3.2%

Industrials

JUSA
8.6%
TEXN
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

JUSA
3.9%
TEXN
2.2%

Energy

JUSA
2.9%
TEXN
36.3%

Utilities

JUSA
2.2%
TEXN
2.8%

Real Estate

JUSA
1.8%
TEXN
4.1%

Basic Materials

JUSA
1.8%
TEXN
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUSA vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JUSA
JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXN
TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JUSA vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JUSATEXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.84

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

9.79

-0.66

JUSA vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the TEXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUSA and TEXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -8.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and TEXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSATEXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-8.81%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.81%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-6.47%

+5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-1.67%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.55%

-0.47%

Volatility

JUSA vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) is 3.61%, while iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that JUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSATEXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.29%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

10.44%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

14.85%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

14.58%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

14.58%

+3.70%

JUSA vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JUSA and TEXN have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUSA vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than TEXN's 1.43% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JUSA and TEXN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEXN has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to JUSA (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs TEXN's -8.81%.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 26.88% vs 20.83% for JUSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, JUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 26.88% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUSA and TEXN have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.79% for JUSA.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.

TEXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUSA and TEXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer