JUSA vs. BLCR
JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JUSA returned 24.65% vs 41.25% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
JUSA vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.03% return.
JUSA
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 41.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUSA vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | 7.68% | 21.69% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 15.03% | 37.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUSA and BLCR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between JUSA and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JUSA vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JUSA
BLCR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
JUSA
BLCR
Financial Services
JUSA
BLCR
Consumer Cyclical
JUSA
BLCR
Communication Services
JUSA
BLCR
Healthcare
JUSA
BLCR
Industrials
JUSA
BLCR
Consumer Defensive
JUSA
BLCR
-
Energy
JUSA
BLCR
Utilities
JUSA
BLCR
Real Estate
JUSA
BLCR
-
Basic Materials
JUSA
BLCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUSA vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
JUSA
BLCR
JUSA vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUSA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 4.04 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 19.01 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUSA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.61 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.77 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
JUSA vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUSA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -21.29% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -10.26% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -4.15% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -2.19% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.18% | -0.24% |
Volatility
JUSA vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) is 3.53%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that JUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUSA | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 5.23% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 12.73% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 15.90% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 17.57% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 17.57% | +1.22% |
JUSA vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUSA vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than BLCR's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% |
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, JUSA and BLCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BLCR has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to JUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs BLCR's -21.29%.
On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 41.25% vs 24.65% for JUSA. On fees, JUSA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 41.25% return vs 24.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JUSA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.
JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.24% for BLCR.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.36% for BLCR.
BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JUSA and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer