PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUSA vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUSA vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.03% return.


JUSA

1D
-2.43%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
7.68%
6M
7.58%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
-3.24%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
15.03%
6M
16.41%
1Y
41.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUSA vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and BLCR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.91

The correlation between JUSA and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUSA vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUSA
BLCR

Technology

35.6%
35.7%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.9%

Communication Services

11.0%
11.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.6%

Industrials

8.3%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Energy

3.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.4%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.2%

Technology

JUSA
35.6%
BLCR
35.7%

Financial Services

JUSA
11.7%
BLCR
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JUSA
11.1%
BLCR
10.9%

Communication Services

JUSA
11.0%
BLCR
11.0%

Healthcare

JUSA
8.5%
BLCR
7.6%

Industrials

JUSA
8.3%
BLCR
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

JUSA
4.3%
BLCR

-

Energy

JUSA
3.5%
BLCR
2.2%

Utilities

JUSA
2.4%
BLCR
1.6%

Real Estate

JUSA
1.9%
BLCR

-

Basic Materials

JUSA
1.9%
BLCR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUSA vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUSA
JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUSA vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSABLCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.04

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

19.01

-6.28

JUSA vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUSA and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSABLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.61

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.77

-0.45

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and BLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSABLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-21.29%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-10.26%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-4.15%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-2.19%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.18%

-0.24%

Volatility

JUSA vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) is 3.53%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that JUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSABLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

5.23%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

12.73%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

15.90%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.57%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.57%

+1.22%

JUSA vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUSA vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than BLCR's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.24%0.33%0.75%0.13%
JUSA
JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
0.88%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JUSA and BLCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BLCR has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to JUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 41.25% vs 24.65% for JUSA. On fees, JUSA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 41.25% return vs 24.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUSA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.24% for BLCR.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.36% for BLCR.

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUSA and BLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer