JUNW vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JUNW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. JUNW is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JUNW returned 10.79%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for EAPR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JUNW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

JUNW vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNW achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 11.39% return.

JUNW

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNW vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JUNW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF	3.15%	11.18%	11.12%	7.28%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.39%	14.80%	2.86%	3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNW and EAPR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2023	0.52

The correlation between JUNW and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUNW vs. EAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JUNW	EAPR
Technology	36.2%	36.9%
Financial Services	11.9%	19.5%
Communication Services	10.9%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	2.9%
Industrials	8.1%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.0%
Energy	3.5%	4.1%
Utilities	2.3%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	6.5%

Return for Risk

JUNW vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNW

JUNW Risk / Return Rank: 89
JUNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
JUNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
JUNW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
JUNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
JUNW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 94
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNW vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNW	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	3.06	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	5.25	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.84	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	7.33	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.43	42.15	-15.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUNW vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNW Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNW and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNW	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	3.06	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.72	0.54	+1.18

Drawdowns

JUNW vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNW drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNW and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNW	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-17.65%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.31%	-3.02%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.57%	-10.24%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.45%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-4.06%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	0.52%	-0.14%

Volatility

JUNW vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) is 0.34%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that JUNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNW	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	3.79%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	6.28%	-3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	7.24%	-3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.41%	10.09%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.41%	10.02%	-3.61%

JUNW vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNW vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither JUNW nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNW and EAPR in my portfolio?

JUNW and EAPR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JUNW or EAPR?

EAPR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to JUNW (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNW dropped -8.57% vs EAPR's -17.65%.

Which ETF is better, JUNW or EAPR?

On 3-year performance, JUNW leads with 10.79% vs 10.62% for EAPR. On fees, JUNW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JUNW has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUNW or EAPR?

Over the 3-year period, JUNW has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNW or EAPR?

JUNW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNW or EAPR?

JUNW and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JUNW and EAPR?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNW and 0.89% for EAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.