PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULZ vs. RNWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
-3.87%13.23%18.76%17.65%-1.34%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
17.03%36.33%-7.36%-3.89%-0.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than RNWZ's 17.03% return.


JULZ

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*

RNWZ

1D
0.87%
1M
1.41%
YTD
17.03%
6M
23.93%
1Y
49.02%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JULZ vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JULZ vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ
JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RNWZ
RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULZRNWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

2.92

-2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

3.72

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.55

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

4.92

-3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.81

20.51

-14.70

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and RNWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULZRNWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

2.92

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.66

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and RNWZ is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than RNWZ's 1.91% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
12.44%11.96%3.30%3.59%0.07%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
1.91%2.12%2.36%3.87%0.01%

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum RNWZ drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and RNWZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JULZRNWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-24.90%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.98%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

0.00%

-5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-7.43%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.40%

-0.17%

Volatility

JULZ vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is 4.48%, while TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that JULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JULZRNWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.95%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

10.85%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

16.87%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

16.87%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.36%

16.87%

-4.51%