PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULZ vs. JULJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JULZ vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JULZ vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
-3.87%13.23%18.76%5.77%
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
0.80%5.91%6.17%3.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than JULJ's 0.80% return.


JULZ

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*

JULJ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JULZ vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULZ and JULJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

JULZ vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ
JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JULJ
JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULZJULJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.27

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

2.11

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.81

15.70

-9.88

JULZ vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the JULJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and JULJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULZJULJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.27

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.91

-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and JULJ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JULZ vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than JULJ's 5.72% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
12.44%11.96%3.30%3.59%0.07%
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
5.72%5.76%5.96%3.21%0.00%

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than JULJ's maximum drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and JULJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JULZJULJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-3.62%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-3.62%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

0.00%

-5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-0.11%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

0.36%

+1.87%

Volatility

JULZ vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) at 0.68%. This indicates that JULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JULZJULJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

0.68%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

1.27%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

4.40%

+9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

3.16%

+9.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.36%

3.16%

+9.20%