JULZ vs. HOCT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. JULZ is passively managed, while HOCT is actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

JULZ vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JULZ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 8.79%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: —

HOCT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULZ vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	7.87%
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October	0.00%

Return for Risk

JULZ vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULZ	HOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULZ	HOCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	—	—

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and HOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULZ	HOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	0.00%	-14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	0.00%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	0.00%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JULZ	HOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.25%	0.00%	+10.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	0.00%	+12.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.32%	0.00%	+12.32%

JULZ vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULZ and HOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

JULZ vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.00%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JULZ or HOCT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULZ or HOCT?

JULZ and HOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULZ or HOCT?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.00%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

What is the main difference between JULZ and HOCT?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.