PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULW vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULW vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULW achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.45% return.


JULW

1D
0.32%
1M
0.47%
6M
4.04%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.91%

XLRI

1D
0.16%
1M
1.35%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$987.83K$2.34M$2.75M
$84.19K$69.65K$65.16K

JULW vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JULW and XLRI is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULW vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JULW
JULW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JULW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
JULW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JULW vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JULWXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.48

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.06

5.18

+11.89

JULW vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULW Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULW and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JULW vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULW drawdown since its inception was -9.49%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULW and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULWXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-7.12%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-7.12%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.62%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-1.54%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

2.03%

-1.49%

Volatility

JULW vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) is 1.62%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that JULW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULWXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

3.42%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.44%

8.72%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

11.09%

-6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.90%

11.11%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

11.11%

-4.63%

JULW vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULW vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

JULW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JULW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.04%
XLRI
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
13.52%6.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JULW and XLRI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRI has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to JULW (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULW dropped -9.49% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, XLRI leads with 10.59% vs 9.65% for JULW. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JULW has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLRI has performed better with a 10.59% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JULW.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.52%, compared with 0.00% for JULW.

JULW is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JULW and 0.35% for XLRI.

JULW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULW and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer