JULQ vs. PBMR
JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) and PBMR (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JULQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBMR.
Performance
JULQ vs. PBMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBMR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ vs. PBMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
PBMR PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March | 4.11% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULQ vs. PBMR — Risk / Return Rank
JULQ
PBMR
JULQ vs. PBMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULQ | PBMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.73 | — |
Drawdowns
JULQ vs. PBMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PBMR drawdown of -7.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and PBMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULQ | PBMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -7.64% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility
JULQ vs. PBMR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULQ | PBMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 4.31% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.60% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.60% | -6.60% |
JULQ vs. PBMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBMR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULQ vs. PBMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither JULQ nor PBMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PBMR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBMR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.
JULQ and PBMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.50% for PBMR.
Find the right allocation for JULQ and PBMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer