JULQ vs. IWMY
JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Options Trading funds. JULQ is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. JULQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
JULQ vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 6.14% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULQ vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
JULQ
IWMY
JULQ vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULQ | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.95 | — |
Drawdowns
JULQ vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULQ | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.72% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.36% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.98% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility
JULQ vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULQ | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.69% | -15.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 15.75% | -15.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 15.75% | -15.75% |
JULQ vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULQ vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
JULQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.00% for JULQ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.99% for IWMY.
Find the right allocation for JULQ and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer