PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULQ vs. APRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULQ vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRP

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.87%
YTD
9.34%
6M
10.32%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULQ vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULQ vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULQ

APRP
APRP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULQ vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULQ vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULQAPRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

Drawdowns

JULQ vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and APRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULQAPRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.66%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.23%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

JULQ vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULQAPRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

4.33%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.49%

-9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.49%

-9.49%

JULQ vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULQ vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULQ nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.

JULQ and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.50% for APRP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULQ and APRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer