JULQ vs. APRP
JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JULQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APRP.
Performance
JULQ vs. APRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April | 8.59% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULQ vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank
JULQ
APRP
JULQ vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULQ | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.36 | — |
Drawdowns
JULQ vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and APRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULQ | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -13.66% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.23% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility
JULQ vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULQ | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 4.33% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.49% | -9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.49% | -9.49% |
JULQ vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULQ vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison
Neither JULQ nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.
JULQ and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.50% for APRP.
Find the right allocation for JULQ and APRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer