PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULM vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July (JULM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULM achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 106.00% return.


JULM

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.02%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXL

1D
-6.38%
1M
2.97%
YTD
106.00%
6M
106.00%
1Y
179.74%
3Y*
55.99%
5Y*
32.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JULM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July
3.02%6.91%3.53%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
106.00%48.94%-7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JULM and FTXL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024

0.68

The correlation between JULM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULM
JULM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JULM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JULM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July (JULM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JULMFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.56

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

12.46

-8.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.71

41.36

-17.65

JULM vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULM Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 4.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULM and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JULM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULM drawdown since its inception was -4.42%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULM and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULMFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-43.87%

+39.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.57%

-14.51%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.18%

+10.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-10.52%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

4.36%

-4.09%

Volatility

JULM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July (JULM) is 0.32%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 24.63%. This indicates that JULM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULMFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

24.63%

-24.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

36.38%

-34.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

42.29%

-40.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

37.41%

-33.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

34.90%

-31.21%

JULM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

JULM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.09%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%
JULM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JULM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (24.63%) compared to JULM (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULM dropped -4.42% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 1-year performance, FTXL leads with 179.74% vs 6.34% for JULM. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JULM has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 179.74% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JULM.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for JULM.

JULM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JULM and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULM and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer