PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULJ vs. IOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JULJ vs. IOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JULJ vs. IOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
0.74%5.91%6.17%3.54%
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.55%18.96%4.88%7.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULJ achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than IOCT's 0.55% return.


JULJ

1D
0.38%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.74%
6M
2.17%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IOCT

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
0.55%
6M
2.58%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JULJ vs. IOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IOCT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JULJ vs. IOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULJ
JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IOCT
IOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULJ vs. IOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULJIOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.02

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.38

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.42

8.65

+6.77

JULJ vs. IOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the IOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULJ and IOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULJIOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

0.82

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between JULJ and IOCT is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JULJ vs. IOCT - Dividend Comparison

JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, while IOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

JULJ vs. IOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULJ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, smaller than the maximum IOCT drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULJ and IOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JULJIOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-16.94%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-5.84%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.97%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-2.73%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.61%

-1.25%

Volatility

JULJ vs. IOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) is 0.68%, while Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that JULJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JULJIOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

4.41%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

6.00%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

10.21%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.17%

9.38%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.17%

9.38%

-6.21%