PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULH vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULH vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JULH

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
YTD
2.22%
6M
1.10%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULH vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULH vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULH
JULH Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JULH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JULH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULH Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULH vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULHHOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

JULH vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULHHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

Drawdowns

JULH vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULH drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULH and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULHHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

0.00%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

Volatility

JULH vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULHHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

0.00%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.75%

0.00%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

0.00%

+4.75%

JULH vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULH and HOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JULH vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

JULH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
5.28%5.31%6.89%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULH and HOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JULH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULH and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer