JULH vs. HOCT
JULH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
JULH vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULH
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULH vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July | 1.73% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULH vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
JULH
HOCT
JULH vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JULH | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULH | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JULH vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULH drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULH and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULH | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | 0.00% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | — | — |
Volatility
JULH vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULH | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 0.00% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 0.00% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 0.00% | +4.75% |
JULH vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JULH and HOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
JULH vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
JULH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July | 5.28% | 5.31% | 6.89% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULH and HOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
JULH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for JULH and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer