JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L
JUKC.L (JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc)) and JEQP.L (JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - JUKC.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while JEQP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JUKC.L is passively managed, while JEQP.L is actively managed. Over the past year, JUKC.L returned 20.86% vs 29.62% for JEQP.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JUKC.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEQP.L.
Performance
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUKC.L achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than JEQP.L's 8.97% return.
JUKC.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEQP.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JUKC.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) | 6.47% | 24.96% | 0.56% |
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 8.97% | 6.58% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUKC.L and JEQP.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JUKC.L
JEQP.L
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) and JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUKC.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 5.23 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 19.59 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUKC.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.63 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUKC.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum JEQP.L drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUKC.L and JEQP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUKC.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -22.00% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -5.64% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -0.35% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -4.92% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.51% | +1.01% |
Volatility
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) at 1.57%. This indicates that JUKC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEQP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUKC.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 1.57% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 7.83% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 11.20% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 14.88% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 14.88% | -2.82% |
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUKC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEQP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUKC.L vs. JEQP.L - Dividend Comparison
JUKC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEQP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 10.21% | 10.04% | 0.73% |
JUKC.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JUKC.L and JEQP.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JUKC.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JUKC.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEQP.L.
JUKC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while JEQP.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JUKC.L and 0.35% for JEQP.L.
Find the right allocation for JUKC.L and JEQP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer