JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L
JUKC.L (JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc)) and JEGP.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - JUKC.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while JEGP.L is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JUKC.L is passively managed, while JEGP.L is actively managed. Over the past year, JUKC.L returned 20.86% vs 2.35% for JEGP.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JUKC.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEGP.L.
Performance
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUKC.L achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than JEGP.L's -1.87% return.
JUKC.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEGP.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JUKC.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) | 6.47% | 24.96% | 9.72% | 3.15% |
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | -1.87% | 4.70% | 9.52% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUKC.L and JEGP.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JUKC.L
JEGP.L
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUKC.L | JEGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 0.25 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 0.75 | +7.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUKC.L | JEGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.28 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.54 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUKC.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, which is greater than JEGP.L's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUKC.L and JEGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUKC.L | JEGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -9.25% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -9.25% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -7.31% | +3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -2.69% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.14% | -0.62% |
Volatility
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that JUKC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUKC.L | JEGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 2.79% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 6.65% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 8.46% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 9.29% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 9.29% | +2.77% |
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUKC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEGP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUKC.L vs. JEGP.L - Dividend Comparison
JUKC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | 8.82% | 8.01% | 6.39% |
JUKC.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JUKC.L and JEGP.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JUKC.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JUKC.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEGP.L.
JUKC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while JEGP.L is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JUKC.L and 0.35% for JEGP.L.
Find the right allocation for JUKC.L and JEGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer