PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JU13.L vs. JPCT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JU13.L) and JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JPCT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JU13.L achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than JPCT.L's 7.02% return.


JU13.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.64%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*

JPCT.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.13%
6M
6.06%
YTD
7.02%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JU13.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.67%5.16%4.03%4.05%-3.80%-0.65%0.13%
JPCT.L
JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
7.02%19.79%17.53%23.63%-18.49%23.68%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JU13.L and JPCT.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020

0.05

The correlation between JU13.L and JPCT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JU13.L
JU13.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JU13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JU13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JU13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JU13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JU13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JPCT.L
JPCT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPCT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPCT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPCT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
JPCT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPCT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JU13.L) and JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JPCT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JU13.LJPCT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.24

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.71

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

7.26

+7.24

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JU13.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the JPCT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JU13.L and JPCT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JU13.L drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum JPCT.L drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JU13.L and JPCT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JU13.LJPCT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-26.59%

+20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

-10.25%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

-17.82%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.72%

-26.59%

+20.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.02%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-5.34%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

2.43%

-2.21%

Volatility

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JU13.L) is 0.38%, while JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JPCT.L) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that JU13.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPCT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JU13.LJPCT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

3.11%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

10.69%

-9.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23%

13.10%

-11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.00%

15.71%

-13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.68%

15.34%

-13.66%

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JU13.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JPCT.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JU13.L vs. JPCT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JU13.L nor JPCT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JPCT.L
JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JU13.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


JU13.L and JPCT.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JU13.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JU13.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JPCT.L.

JU13.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while JPCT.L is Global Equities. JU13.L tracks JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc), while JPCT.L tracks JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF - USD (acc). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for JU13.L and 0.19% for JPCT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JU13.L and JPCT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer