PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSTC vs. VEGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSTC vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSTC achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than VEGA's 5.98% return.


JSTC

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.08%
6M
9.52%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.55%

VEGA

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.55%
6M
3.67%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
7.55%
ALL TIME*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.31M$859.73K$669.66K
$235.51K$205.05K$288.45K

JSTC vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
11.63%12.02%8.96%15.67%-17.58%19.28%2.48%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
5.98%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JSTC and VEGA is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.83

The correlation between JSTC and VEGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSTC vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSTC
JSTC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JSTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSTC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JSTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSTC vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSTCVEGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.93

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

8.06

-1.31

JSTC vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VEGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSTC and VEGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSTC vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSTC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSTC and VEGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSTCVEGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-28.37%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-6.86%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

-11.62%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-22.78%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.56%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-3.76%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.64%

+0.83%

Volatility

JSTC vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison

Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.85%. This indicates that JSTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSTCVEGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.85%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

8.06%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.12%

9.87%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

12.29%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

12.73%

+3.02%

JSTC vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSTC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSTC vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

JSTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than VEGA's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
1.22%1.34%1.11%1.03%0.83%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.27%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSTC and VEGA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSTC has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to VEGA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSTC dropped -26.82% vs VEGA's -28.37%.

On 5-year performance, VEGA leads with 6.69% vs 6.37% for JSTC. On fees, JSTC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEGA has performed better with a 6.69% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSTC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.22% for JSTC.

They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for JSTC and 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSTC and VEGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer