JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE
JSRI.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis) and ASRM.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSRI.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while ASRM.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Both are passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JSRI.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ASRM.DE.
Performance
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JSRI.DE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ASRM.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSRI.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis | 7.00% | 3.81% | 1.12% | 10.63% | -16.21% | 6.00% | 9.71% | 26.10% | -8.97% |
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -78.40% | -3.99% | -3.83% | 0.89% | -16.42% | -14.47% | -6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSRI.DE and ASRM.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
JSRI.DE
ASRM.DE
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis (JSRI.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSRI.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSRI.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSRI.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | — | — |
Volatility
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSRI.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | — | — |
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSRI.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSRI.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison
JSRI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSRI.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis | 2.44% | 1.91% | 1.85% | 4.41% | 2.87% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSRI.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JSRI.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JSRI.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ASRM.DE.
JSRI.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ASRM.DE is REIT. JSRI.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JSRI.DE and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.
Find the right allocation for JSRI.DE and ASRM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer