PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. JIII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. JIII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly higher than JIII's 1.45% return.


JSMD

1D
2.28%
1M
-3.09%
6M
10.51%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
13.97%

JIII

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.42%
6M
1.02%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$497.65K$594.07K$758.21K
$5.51M$7.19M$7.86M

JSMD vs. JIII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.38%9.25%-5.97%
JIII
Janus Henderson Income ETF
1.45%8.28%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and JIII is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. JIII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JIII
JIII Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JIII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIII Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIII Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JIII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIII Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSMD vs. JIII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDJIIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.11

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

7.65

-2.93

JSMD vs. JIII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the JIII Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and JIII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. JIII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than JIII's maximum drawdown of -3.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and JIII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDJIIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-3.55%

-35.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-2.27%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-0.59%

-5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-0.49%

-6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

0.62%

+4.07%

Volatility

JSMD vs. JIII - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) at 0.86%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDJIIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

0.86%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.87%

2.97%

+14.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

3.65%

+18.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.15%

3.93%

+19.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

3.93%

+18.94%

JSMD vs. JIII - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JIII's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. JIII - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than JIII's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JIII
Janus Henderson Income ETF
7.33%7.33%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and JIII have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to JIII (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs JIII's -3.55%.

On 1-year performance, JSMD leads with 22.10% vs 4.76% for JIII. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JIII has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 22.10% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for JIII.

JIII has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JIII is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.54% for JIII.

JIII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and JIII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer