PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. IBHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. IBHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly higher than IBHI's 1.47% return.


JSMD

1D
0.29%
1M
4.71%
YTD
18.04%
6M
15.17%
1Y
30.30%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
13.65%

IBHI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.47%
6M
2.17%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. IBHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
18.04%9.25%15.08%26.81%-11.51%
IBHI
iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.47%7.88%8.33%14.21%-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and IBHI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022

0.64

The correlation between JSMD and IBHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. IBHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHI
IBHI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IBHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. IBHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDIBHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.22

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

14.06

-8.64

JSMD vs. IBHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the IBHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and IBHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. IBHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than IBHI's maximum drawdown of -13.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and IBHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDIBHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-13.65%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-2.11%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-5.73%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.21%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-2.83%

-4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

0.48%

+3.95%

Volatility

JSMD vs. IBHI - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) at 0.97%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDIBHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

0.97%

+7.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

2.79%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.48%

3.82%

+18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

7.96%

+15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

7.96%

+14.86%

JSMD vs. IBHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. IBHI - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than IBHI's 6.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBHI
iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.70%6.79%6.66%6.48%5.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.47%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and IBHI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to IBHI (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs IBHI's -13.65%.

On 3-year performance, JSMD leads with 17.13% vs 8.77% for IBHI. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IBHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 17.13% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHI.

IBHI has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.47% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IBHI is High Yield Bonds. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IBHI tracks Bloomberg 2029 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.35% for IBHI.

IBHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and IBHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer