PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. FAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. FAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 18.95% return, which is significantly higher than FAD's 16.78% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has underperformed FAD with an annualized return of 13.29%, while FAD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


JSMD

1D
0.92%
1M
0.77%
6M
12.73%
YTD
18.95%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
13.29%

FAD

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.63%
6M
11.50%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. FAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
18.95%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
16.78%17.23%23.85%19.07%-24.06%21.17%34.92%26.66%-6.45%25.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and FAD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.89

The correlation between JSMD and FAD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. FAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
FAD

Technology

28.1%
27.4%

Industrials

23.3%
25.0%

Healthcare

18.7%
14.8%

Financial Services

8.9%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
2.2%

Energy

1.1%
1.3%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Technology

JSMD
28.1%
FAD
27.4%

Industrials

JSMD
23.3%
FAD
25.0%

Healthcare

JSMD
18.7%
FAD
14.8%

Financial Services

JSMD
8.9%
FAD
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
8.7%
FAD
10.1%

Basic Materials

JSMD
3.0%
FAD
2.9%

Communication Services

JSMD
2.9%
FAD
3.1%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.8%
FAD
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.5%
FAD
2.2%

Energy

JSMD
1.1%
FAD
1.3%

Utilities

JSMD

-

FAD
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. FAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FAD
FAD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. FAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDFADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.64

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

9.55

-4.17

JSMD vs. FAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the FAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and FAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. FAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum FAD drawdown of -54.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and FAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDFADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-54.33%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-10.66%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-23.55%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-31.99%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

-37.25%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-5.53%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-9.60%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.94%

+1.49%

Volatility

JSMD vs. FAD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) is 6.00%, while First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that JSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDFADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.68%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

15.91%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.17%

20.14%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

20.85%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

21.32%

+1.49%

JSMD vs. FAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FAD's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. FAD - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than FAD's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.09%0.09%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.42%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JSMD and FAD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAD has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to JSMD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs FAD's -54.33%.

On 10-year performance, FAD leads with 14.08% vs 13.29% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JSMD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAD has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FAD.

JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.09% for FAD.

JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while FAD tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.63% for FAD.

FAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and FAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer