JSCP vs. DBO
JSCP (JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - JSCP is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. JSCP is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSCP returned 2.37%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. JSCP charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
JSCP vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSCP achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
JSCP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
JSCP vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSCP JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF | 0.60% | 6.86% | 5.06% | 6.22% | -5.80% | 0.18% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 31.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSCP and DBO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | -0.08 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JSCP and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
JSCP vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSCP
DBO
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
JSCP
DBO
-
Financial Services
JSCP
DBO
Technology
JSCP
DBO
-
Real Estate
JSCP
DBO
-
Healthcare
JSCP
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
JSCP
DBO
-
Energy
JSCP
DBO
-
Utilities
JSCP
DBO
-
Basic Materials
JSCP
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
JSCP
DBO
-
Industrials
JSCP
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSCP vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
JSCP
DBO
JSCP vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF (JSCP) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSCP | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.38 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.44 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 9.02 | +4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSCP | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.34 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.50 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.02 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
JSCP vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSCP drawdown since its inception was -8.90%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSCP and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSCP | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -90.18% | +81.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.27% | -18.19% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.59% | -28.20% | +26.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.90% | -37.68% | +28.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -51.38% | +51.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -62.25% | +60.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 8.92% | -8.59% |
Volatility
JSCP vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF (JSCP) is 0.54%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that JSCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSCP | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 12.61% | -12.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | 28.20% | -26.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73% | 34.46% | -32.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.57% | 32.29% | -29.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.55% | 31.78% | -29.23% |
JSCP vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSCP has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSCP vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
JSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
JSCP JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF | 4.49% | 4.64% | 4.76% | 4.13% | 2.51% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSCP and DBO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to JSCP (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSCP dropped -8.90% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 2.37% for JSCP. On fees, JSCP is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, JSCP has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSCP is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
JSCP has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
JSCP is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JSCP and 0.78% for DBO.
JSCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSCP and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer