JSCGX vs. NEAIX
JSCGX (Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund) and NEAIX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JSCGX returned -8.61%/yr vs 17.76%/yr for NEAIX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JSCGX charges 1.97%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for NEAIX.
Performance
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSCGX achieves a -25.96% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 32.18% return.
JSCGX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -16.13%
- YTD
- -25.96%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -8.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.28%
NEAIX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 1Y
- 49.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | -25.96% | 41.65% | 12.89% | 18.74% | -50.37% | -0.60% | 60.95% | 20.04% | 8.26% | 20.61% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 32.18% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 44.68% | -15.64% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSCGX and NEAIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JSCGX and NEAIX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSCGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank
JSCGX
NEAIX
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSCGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.25 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.94 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 8.42 | -8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSCGX drawdown since its inception was -70.07%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSCGX and NEAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSCGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.07% | -35.93% | -34.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.69% | -24.09% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.69% | -28.21% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.86% | -35.93% | -31.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.66% | -20.48% | -28.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -8.60% | -16.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 5.53% | +12.67% |
Volatility
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) is 6.85%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that JSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSCGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 13.04% | -6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 26.26% | -4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 30.84% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.28% | 25.66% | +10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.78% | 25.07% | +7.71% |
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSCGX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSCGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison
JSCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.09% | 13.69% | 2.57% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.52% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSCGX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAIX has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to JSCGX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSCGX dropped -70.07% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.
NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSCGX and NEAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer