JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L
JRUB.L (JPMorgan ETFs Ireland ICAV - JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JRUB.L is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JRUB.L returned 4.87% vs 22.59% for JEPQ.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRUB.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.
Performance
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JRUB.L achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.L's 8.88% return.
JRUB.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JRUB.L JPMorgan ETFs Ireland ICAV - JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | -0.11% | 7.75% | -0.21% |
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.88% | 14.79% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JRUB.L and JEPQ.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
JRUB.L
JEPQ.L
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ETFs Ireland ICAV - JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JRUB.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JRUB.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.72 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 11.26 | -6.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JRUB.L drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, which is greater than JEPQ.L's maximum drawdown of -20.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRUB.L and JEPQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JRUB.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.30% | -20.08% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -8.31% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.48% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -2.68% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 2.01% | -0.99% |
Volatility
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan ETFs Ireland ICAV - JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JRUB.L) is 0.97%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that JRUB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JRUB.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 4.79% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 10.26% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47% | 13.13% | -8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 16.29% | -8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 16.29% | -8.47% |
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JRUB.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JRUB.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
JRUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.11% | 10.06% | 0.74% |
JRUB.L JPMorgan ETFs Ireland ICAV - JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JRUB.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
JRUB.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JRUB.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
Find the right allocation for JRUB.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer