JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L
JRJE.L (JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - JRJE.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRJE.L returned 17.56%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for IJPA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JRJE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IJPA.L.
Performance
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JRJE.L is traded in GBp, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JRJE.L having a 19.44% return and IJPA.L slightly lower at 18.74%.
JRJE.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 39.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJPA.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRJE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 19.44% | 15.91% | 9.56% | 13.90% | -0.96% |
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 18.74% | 18.21% | 8.48% | 13.38% | -2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Technology
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Financial Services
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Communication Services
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Healthcare
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Basic Materials
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Real Estate
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Energy
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Utilities
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
JRJE.L
IJPA.L
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JRJE.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.70 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 12.06 | -0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JRJE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -41.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRJE.L and IJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JRJE.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -41.68% | +27.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -10.63% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -13.21% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -2.50% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.39% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.27% | +0.09% |
Volatility
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that JRJE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JRJE.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.11% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 16.33% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 19.36% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 16.33% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 16.51% | -0.31% |
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JRJE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JRJE.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JRJE.L nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, JRJE.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRJE.L.
JRJE.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRJE.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for JRJE.L and IJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer