JRJE.L vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JRJE.L (JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JRJE.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRJE.L returned 17.56%/yr vs 26.73%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRJE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JRJE.L is traded in GBp, while EMXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMXC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRJE.L achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 43.56% return.

JRJE.L

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 39.05%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMXC

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 43.56%
• 6M: 45.37%
• 1Y: 72.59%
• 3Y*: 26.73%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JRJE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	19.44%	15.91%	9.56%	13.90%	-0.96%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	43.56%	25.51%	4.47%	13.01%	-10.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JRJE.L and EMXC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.41

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JRJE.L	EMXC
Industrials	25.0%	6.9%
Technology	19.9%	52.4%
Financial Services	17.6%	17.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	4.1%
Communication Services	8.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	6.5%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	2.4%
Basic Materials	2.7%	6.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.8%
Energy	1.2%	3.4%
Utilities	1.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

JRJE.L vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRJE.L

JRJE.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
JRJE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JRJE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JRJE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
JRJE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
JRJE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 88
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRJE.L	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	3.15	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.68	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.60	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	6.02	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.59	21.60	-10.01

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRJE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRJE.L and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRJE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -32.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRJE.L and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRJE.L	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-32.24%	+17.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.63%	-12.12%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.26%	-16.85%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-4.18%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-5.69%	+2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.37%	-0.01%

Volatility

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) is 6.50%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that JRJE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRJE.L	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	13.66%	-7.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.58%	21.48%	-5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.93%	23.15%	-4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	16.20%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.20%	18.95%	-2.75%

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRJE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRJE.L vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

JRJE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.89%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%
JRJE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRJE.L and EMXC in my portfolio?

JRJE.L and EMXC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JRJE.L or EMXC?

On fees, JRJE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRJE.L or EMXC?

JRJE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between JRJE.L and EMXC?

JRJE.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. JRJE.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRJE.L and 0.49% for EMXC.