PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRIE.L is traded in GBp, while EEJG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EEJG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRIE.L achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than EEJG.L's 15.84% return.


JRIE.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
6.24%
YTD
16.88%
6M
15.92%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
10Y*

EEJG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.45%
YTD
15.84%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.38%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRIE.L
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
16.88%14.41%12.30%14.34%4.72%
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.84%17.60%6.43%13.48%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JRIE.L and EEJG.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.25

The correlation between JRIE.L and EEJG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRIE.L
JRIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

EEJG.L
EEJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRIE.LEEJG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.35

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.64

3.01

+13.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.46

9.84

+36.62

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.92, which is higher than the EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRIE.L and EEJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRIE.LEEJG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92

1.82

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.80

0.66

+3.14

Drawdowns

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRIE.L drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, smaller than the maximum EEJG.L drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRIE.L and EEJG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRIE.LEEJG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-19.37%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-11.39%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-13.99%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.30%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-5.78%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

Volatility

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) is 3.86%, while iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that JRIE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRIE.LEEJG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.29%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.53%

18.80%

+15.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

15.92%

+19.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

15.99%

+19.67%

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRIE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EEJG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRIE.L vs. EEJG.L - Dividend Comparison

JRIE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than EEJG.L's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.36%1.57%1.81%1.74%2.10%1.69%1.64%
JRIE.L
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
1.52%1.81%1.53%1.72%2.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRIE.L and EEJG.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEJG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEJG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRIE.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRIE.L and 0.15% for EEJG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRIE.L and EEJG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer