PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRGD.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.


JRGD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
4.30%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.92%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
10Y*

CSY9.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.99%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.34%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRGD.DE
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
10.32%6.67%25.38%21.25%-13.07%10.88%
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
3.19%-0.67%16.05%5.76%-5.25%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.68

The correlation between JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRGD.DE
JRGD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRGD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRGD.DECSY9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.07

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

0.69

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

1.54

+13.93

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRGD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRGD.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.38

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.61

+0.24

Drawdowns

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRGD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.56%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRGD.DECSY9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-13.92%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-4.48%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.56%

-13.92%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.72%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-3.70%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.00%

-0.53%

Volatility

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that JRGD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRGD.DECSY9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.09%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

5.48%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

8.07%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

12.03%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

11.91%

+2.42%

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRGD.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

JRGD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while CSY9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

JRGD.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Credit Suisse.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRGD.DE and CSY9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer