PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREM.L vs. JRDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JREM.L is traded in USD, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JREM.L having a 23.23% return and JRDM.L slightly lower at 23.07%.


JREM.L

1D
-4.56%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
23.23%
6M
25.25%
1Y
48.04%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*

JRDM.L

1D
-4.47%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
23.07%
6M
24.96%
1Y
3,741.58%
3Y*
367.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JREM.L and JRDM.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.92

The correlation between JREM.L and JRDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREM.L
JREM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JREM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JREM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDM.L
JRDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREM.LJRDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-96.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

14.63

-13.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

288.32

-284.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

1,069.67

-1,056.01

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREM.L and JRDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREM.LJRDM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.36

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.27

+0.21

Drawdowns

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREM.L drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, smaller than the maximum JRDM.L drawdown of -52.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREM.L and JRDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREM.LJRDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-52.52%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-12.79%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-16.06%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-7.01%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-30.02%

+14.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.45%

+0.06%

Volatility

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) have volatilities of 9.75% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREM.LJRDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

9.32%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

16.88%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.64%

1,098.51%

-1,077.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

511.60%

-492.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

511.60%

-491.05%

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JREM.L and JRDM.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

JREM.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison

JREM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JREM.L and JRDM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREM.L and JRDM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREM.L and JRDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer