JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JREM.DE (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and XEMD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - JREM.DE tracks the JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) while XEMD.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREM.DE returned 21.35%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for XEMD.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JREM.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XEMD.DE.

Performance

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREM.DE achieves a 30.82% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD.DE's 28.06% return.

JREM.DE

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 6.61%
• YTD: 30.82%
• 6M: 32.74%
• 1Y: 54.32%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: —

XEMD.DE

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 28.06%
• 6M: 29.15%
• 1Y: 49.56%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JREM.DE JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	30.82%	19.77%	12.75%	4.21%	-15.62%	-1.48%
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D	28.06%	18.67%	13.85%	5.68%	-14.85%	-1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JREM.DE and XEMD.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.98

The correlation between JREM.DE and XEMD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREM.DE

JREM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 89
JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
JREM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
JREM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JREM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
JREM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XEMD.DE

XEMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 84
XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XEMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XEMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XEMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JREM.DE	XEMD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	2.77	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	3.71	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.50	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.31	4.60	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.31	16.76	+2.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREM.DE and XEMD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JREM.DE	XEMD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	2.77	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.58	-0.02

Drawdowns

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, which is greater than XEMD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREM.DE and XEMD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	JREM.DE	XEMD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.28%	-23.50%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-10.72%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.29%	-19.19%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-2.54%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-9.22%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	2.95%	-0.14%

Volatility

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) have volatilities of 7.19% and 7.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JREM.DE	XEMD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.19%	7.39%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.32%	15.08%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	17.84%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	16.76%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	16.76%	+2.21%

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREM.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

JREM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Dividend Comparison

JREM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JREM.DE JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D	1.55%	1.92%	3.01%	2.38%	2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JREM.DE and XEMD.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JREM.DE and XEMD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JREM.DE or XEMD.DE?

On fees, XEMD.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JREM.DE or XEMD.DE?

XEMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JREM.DE.

What is the main difference between JREM.DE and XEMD.DE?

JREM.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while XEMD.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JREM.DE and 0.18% for XEMD.DE.