JREJ.L vs. N4US.L
JREJ.L (JPM Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and N4US.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds. JREJ.L is actively managed, while N4US.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREJ.L returned 15.82%/yr vs 27.49%/yr for N4US.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JREJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for N4US.L.
Performance
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREJ.L achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than N4US.L's 18.80% return.
JREJ.L
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
N4US.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- 45.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREJ.L JPM Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.38% | 24.21% | 7.80% | 20.39% | -10.13% |
N4US.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 18.80% | 30.25% | 23.77% | 35.97% | 0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREJ.L and N4US.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JREJ.L and N4US.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank
JREJ.L
N4US.L
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREJ.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JREJ.L | N4US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 4.84 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 16.48 | -8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREJ.L drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum N4US.L drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREJ.L and N4US.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREJ.L | N4US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -30.94% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -9.35% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.89% | -21.38% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -4.48% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -6.78% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.75% | +1.09% |
Volatility
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREJ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) at 6.15%. This indicates that JREJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N4US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREJ.L | N4US.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 6.15% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 15.63% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 19.57% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 18.50% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 18.38% | +0.19% |
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JREJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JREJ.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JREJ.L nor N4US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JREJ.L and N4US.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREJ.L.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JREJ.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.
Find the right allocation for JREJ.L and N4US.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer