PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREG.L vs. XDEV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JREG.L is traded in USD, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREG.L achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 34.16% return.


JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
3.59%
YTD
9.43%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

XDEV.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
12.15%
YTD
34.16%
6M
38.41%
1Y
66.17%
3Y*
30.19%
5Y*
16.29%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.43%19.75%18.68%25.69%-17.71%24.33%17.21%27.94%-9.05%
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
34.16%40.36%5.01%19.23%-9.79%20.57%-4.03%19.16%-10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.L and XDEV.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.80

The correlation between JREG.L and XDEV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JREG.L
XDEV.L

Technology

28.6%
33.9%

Financial Services

15.4%
14.8%

Industrials

11.3%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
7.9%

Communication Services

9.1%
7.5%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.5%

Energy

4.2%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.0%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

JREG.L
28.6%
XDEV.L
33.9%

Financial Services

JREG.L
15.4%
XDEV.L
14.8%

Industrials

JREG.L
11.3%
XDEV.L
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JREG.L
10.1%
XDEV.L
7.9%

Communication Services

JREG.L
9.1%
XDEV.L
7.5%

Healthcare

JREG.L
8.9%
XDEV.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

JREG.L
4.6%
XDEV.L
4.5%

Energy

JREG.L
4.2%
XDEV.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

JREG.L
3.2%
XDEV.L
3.0%

Utilities

JREG.L
2.9%
XDEV.L
2.6%

Real Estate

JREG.L
1.7%
XDEV.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEV.L
XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREG.LXDEV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.81

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

7.54

-4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

29.47

-16.72

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.L and XDEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREG.LXDEV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

4.46

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.04

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.68

+0.14

Drawdowns

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -38.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.L and XDEV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREG.LXDEV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-38.95%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.73%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-14.69%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.33%

-26.72%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.86%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-7.12%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.24%

-0.26%

Volatility

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) is 3.20%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that JREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREG.LXDEV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

5.95%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

11.90%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

14.78%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.73%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.72%

+0.33%

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JREG.L and XDEV.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JREG.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREG.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JREG.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREG.L and XDEV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREG.L and XDEV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer