JREG.L vs. LGUS.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

JREG.L (JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - JREG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while LGUS.L tracks the L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JREG.L returned 11.92%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for LGUS.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JREG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUS.L.

Performance

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JREG.L having a 10.25% return and LGUS.L slightly higher at 10.34%.

JREG.L

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 9.38%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 1Y: 21.72%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: —

LGUS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 9.90%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JREG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)	10.25%	19.75%	18.69%	25.69%	-17.71%	24.33%	17.21%	27.94%	-8.87%
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF	10.34%	17.98%	25.09%	28.66%	-20.46%	27.91%	21.16%	30.91%	-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.L and LGUS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.95

The correlation between JREG.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.L

JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LGUS.L

LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JREG.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.79	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.69	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.59	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	9.99	+0.63

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.L and LGUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JREG.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.82%	-34.26%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-8.58%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.74%	-19.46%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.33%	-25.64%	+0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.49%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-5.30%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.23%	-0.19%

Volatility

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) is 2.59%, while L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that JREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JREG.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	2.86%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	9.41%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	12.47%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.54%	16.51%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	18.10%	-1.15%

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JREG.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREG.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JREG.L and LGUS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JREG.L and LGUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JREG.L or LGUS.L?

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JREG.L or LGUS.L?

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

What is the main difference between JREG.L and LGUS.L?

JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JREG.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.