PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREG.L vs. JMBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JREG.L is traded in USD, while JMBP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JMBP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREG.L achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than JMBP.L's 1.37% return.


JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
3.59%
YTD
9.43%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

JMBP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
0.14%
YTD
1.37%
6M
2.74%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.43%19.75%18.68%25.69%-17.71%24.33%17.21%2.61%
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
1.37%21.65%-0.09%14.09%-26.38%-3.74%6.84%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.L and JMBP.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.54

The correlation between JREG.L and JMBP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREG.LJMBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.26

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

4.12

+8.63

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.L and JMBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREG.LJMBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

0.99

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

-0.02

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.09

+0.74

Drawdowns

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum JMBP.L drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.L and JMBP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREG.LJMBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-42.43%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-7.69%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-13.74%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.33%

-42.43%

+17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-2.10%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-14.97%

+10.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.37%

-0.39%

Volatility

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREG.LJMBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.16%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

7.50%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

9.85%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

14.21%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.24%

+0.81%

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBP.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JREG.L vs. JMBP.L - Dividend Comparison

JREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.75%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JREG.L and JMBP.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBP.L.

JREG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while JMBP.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JREG.L and 0.39% for JMBP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREG.L and JMBP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer