JREG.L vs. BBUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JREG.L (JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and BBUS.L (BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - JREG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BBUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JREG.L returned 12.10%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for BBUS.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JREG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBUS.L.

Performance

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREG.L achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS.L's 10.13% return.

JREG.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 20.19%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

BBUS.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: 13.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JREG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)	9.43%	19.75%	18.68%	25.69%	-17.71%	24.33%	17.21%	11.69%
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc	10.13%	17.54%	24.99%	27.63%	-19.96%	27.64%	20.13%	12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.L and BBUS.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.97

The correlation between JREG.L and BBUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JREG.L	BBUS.L
Technology	28.6%	39.7%
Financial Services	15.4%	10.9%
Industrials	11.3%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.7%
Communication Services	9.1%	11.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.1%
Energy	4.2%	3.2%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.4%
Utilities	2.9%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.L

JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BBUS.L

BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JREG.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.35	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.41	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.16	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.75	13.61	-0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JREG.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.35	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.83	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.89	-0.07

Drawdowns

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.L and BBUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JREG.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.82%	-34.26%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-8.62%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.74%	-19.35%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.33%	-25.33%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.46%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-5.40%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.01%	-0.03%

Volatility

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JREG.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.23%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	8.55%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	11.59%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	16.10%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	17.86%	-0.81%

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JREG.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREG.L nor BBUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JREG.L and BBUS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JREG.L and BBUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JREG.L or BBUS.L?

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JREG.L or BBUS.L?

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

What is the main difference between JREG.L and BBUS.L?

JREG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BBUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BBUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JREG.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.