PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREG.DE achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.


JREG.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
4.29%
YTD
10.36%
6M
11.00%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*

CSY9.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.99%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.34%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JREG.DE
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
10.36%6.82%25.54%21.37%-13.19%35.15%12.92%
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
3.19%-0.67%16.05%5.76%-5.25%23.30%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020

0.71

The correlation between JREG.DE and CSY9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.DE
JREG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JREG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREG.DECSY9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.07

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

0.69

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

1.54

+13.97

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.DE and CSY9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREG.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.38

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.51

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.61

+0.27

Drawdowns

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.DE and CSY9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREG.DECSY9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.56%

-13.92%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-4.48%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-13.92%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-13.92%

-7.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.72%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-3.70%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.00%

-0.53%

Volatility

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that JREG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREG.DECSY9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.09%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

5.48%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

8.07%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.04%

12.03%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

11.91%

+4.05%

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JREG.DE and CSY9.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JREG.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREG.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JREG.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREG.DE and CSY9.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

JREG.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Credit Suisse.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREG.DE and CSY9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer