PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JREB.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREB.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than PRAC.DE's 0.60% return.


JREB.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.53%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*

PRAC.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.63%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JREB.DE
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.57%3.18%4.24%7.63%-13.23%-1.04%1.69%
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
0.60%3.03%4.31%7.53%-13.95%-1.04%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between JREB.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020

0.88

The correlation between JREB.DE and PRAC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREB.DE
JREB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JREB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JREB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAC.DE
PRAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JREB.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREB.DEPRAC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

2.65

-0.13

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREB.DE and PRAC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREB.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.01

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.02

+0.21

Drawdowns

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREB.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREB.DE and PRAC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREB.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-17.86%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.70%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.83%

-2.70%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.22%

-17.86%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.69%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-6.27%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.78%

+0.02%

Volatility

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JREB.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) at 0.99%. This indicates that JREB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREB.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.99%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

2.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

3.26%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

4.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

4.73%

+0.23%

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREB.DE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JREB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREB.DE nor PRAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JREB.DE and PRAC.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JREB.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREB.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.

JREB.DE tracks JP Morgan EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG), while PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for JREB.DE and 0.50% for PRAC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREB.DE and PRAC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer