JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L
JREA.L (JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and IPXJ.L (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds. JREA.L is actively managed, while IPXJ.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREA.L returned 19.71%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for IPXJ.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREA.L achieves a 23.48% return, which is significantly higher than IPXJ.L's 10.20% return.
JREA.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- YTD
- 23.48%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREA.L JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 23.48% | 29.63% | 8.81% | 4.45% | -11.27% |
IPXJ.L iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.20% | 19.91% | 4.45% | 5.64% | -9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREA.L and IPXJ.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between JREA.L and IPXJ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
JREA.L
IPXJ.L
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREA.L) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JREA.L | IPXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.81 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 4.92 | +5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum IPXJ.L drawdown of -38.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREA.L and IPXJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREA.L | IPXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -38.93% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -8.53% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.58% | -18.67% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -1.69% | -5.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -8.62% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 3.15% | +0.61% |
Volatility
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREA.L) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IPXJ.L) at 3.37%. This indicates that JREA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREA.L | IPXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 3.37% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.03% | 11.42% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 13.84% | +7.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.21% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.71% | +1.87% |
Dividends
JREA.L vs. IPXJ.L - Dividend Comparison
JREA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPXJ.L iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.56% | 2.88% | 3.49% | 3.50% | 3.76% | 2.92% | 2.45% | 3.58% | 3.92% | 3.19% | 3.48% | 3.44% |
JREA.L JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JREA.L and IPXJ.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: ETF Issuer and iShares.
Find the right allocation for JREA.L and IPXJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer