PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRE vs. SCRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRE vs. SCRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRE achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCRD's 0.33% return.


JRE

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
13.17%
6M
12.26%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
10Y*

SCRD

1D
0.09%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRE vs. SCRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRE
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF
13.17%2.97%7.65%8.79%-23.47%9.52%
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.33%7.77%3.21%8.76%-15.99%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JRE and SCRD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.41

JRE vs. SCRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRE
SCRD

Real Estate

95.9%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Energy

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

25.0%

Healthcare

-

12.5%

Industrials

-

8.2%

Technology

-

4.5%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Real Estate

JRE
95.9%
SCRD
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JRE
4.1%
SCRD
5.9%

Basic Materials

JRE

-

SCRD
2.2%

Communication Services

JRE

-

SCRD
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

JRE

-

SCRD
6.6%

Energy

JRE

-

SCRD
2.3%

Financial Services

JRE

-

SCRD
25.0%

Healthcare

JRE

-

SCRD
12.5%

Industrials

JRE

-

SCRD
8.2%

Technology

JRE

-

SCRD
4.5%

Utilities

JRE

-

SCRD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRE vs. SCRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRE
JRE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCRD
SCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRE vs. SCRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRESCRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.98

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

6.88

+0.04

JRE vs. SCRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the SCRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRE and SCRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRESCRDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.48

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.02

+0.19

Drawdowns

JRE vs. SCRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRE drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than SCRD's maximum drawdown of -21.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRE and SCRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRESCRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

-21.17%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-2.87%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-6.84%

-11.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-0.89%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.62%

-8.76%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

0.82%

+1.48%

Volatility

JRE vs. SCRD - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) at 1.24%. This indicates that JRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRESCRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

1.24%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

2.78%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

3.88%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

6.31%

+12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

6.31%

+12.40%

JRE vs. SCRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCRD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRE vs. SCRD - Dividend Comparison

JRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than SCRD's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JRE
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.99%5.81%2.20%2.77%2.87%0.90%
SCRD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRE and SCRD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRE has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to SCRD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRE dropped -31.69% vs SCRD's -21.17%.

On 3-year performance, JRE leads with 10.22% vs 5.64% for SCRD. On fees, SCRD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SCRD has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JRE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCRD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JRE.

SCRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.99% for JRE.

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JRE and 0.35% for SCRD.

SCRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRE and SCRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer