PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) and JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRDM.L is traded in GBp, while JPGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JPGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRDM.L achieves a 31.14% return, which is significantly higher than JPGL.L's 10.22% return.


JRDM.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
10.87%
YTD
31.14%
6M
33.65%
1Y
62.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPGL.L

1D
0.74%
1M
2.52%
YTD
10.22%
6M
10.73%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JRDM.L and JPGL.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.27

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRDM.L
JPGL.L

Technology

37.5%
12.3%

Financial Services

20.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.0%

Communication Services

7.3%
5.6%

Industrials

6.8%
10.4%

Basic Materials

5.9%
8.4%

Energy

4.5%
7.9%

Healthcare

2.7%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
8.2%

Utilities

1.6%
8.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
7.1%

Technology

JRDM.L
37.5%
JPGL.L
12.3%

Financial Services

JRDM.L
20.3%
JPGL.L
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JRDM.L
10.7%
JPGL.L
8.0%

Communication Services

JRDM.L
7.3%
JPGL.L
5.6%

Industrials

JRDM.L
6.8%
JPGL.L
10.4%

Basic Materials

JRDM.L
5.9%
JPGL.L
8.4%

Energy

JRDM.L
4.5%
JPGL.L
7.9%

Healthcare

JRDM.L
2.7%
JPGL.L
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

JRDM.L
2.5%
JPGL.L
8.2%

Utilities

JRDM.L
1.6%
JPGL.L
8.8%

Real Estate

JRDM.L
0.4%
JPGL.L
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRDM.L
JRDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.L
JPGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) and JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRDM.LJPGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.43

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.66

3.97

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.51

15.42

+7.09

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is higher than the JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDM.L and JPGL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRDM.LJPGL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04

2.38

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.28

0.63

+1.65

Drawdowns

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDM.L drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDM.L and JPGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRDM.LJPGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-28.18%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-5.75%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.21%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-3.37%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.48%

+1.51%

Volatility

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that JRDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRDM.LJPGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

2.84%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

7.48%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

9.60%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

12.31%

+7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

15.03%

+4.68%

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRDM.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JPGL.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRDM.L vs. JPGL.L - Dividend Comparison

JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while JPGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JRDM.L and JPGL.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPGL.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPGL.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JRDM.L.

JRDM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JPGL.L is Global Equities. JRDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while JPGL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JRDM.L and 0.19% for JPGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRDM.L and JPGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer