JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JRDG.L (JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from JPMorgan and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRDG.L returned 17.10%/yr vs 6.61%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRDG.L achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return.

JRDG.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 26.21%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDEB.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 3.25%
• 3Y*: 6.61%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JRDG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)	9.68%	11.47%	20.63%	18.78%	-7.76%	7.99%
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	1.04%	3.40%	13.01%	1.49%	1.23%	5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JRDG.L and XDEB.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between JRDG.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JRDG.L	XDEB.L
Technology	28.6%	20.1%
Financial Services	15.4%	14.0%
Industrials	11.3%	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	5.6%
Communication Services	9.1%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.9%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	10.9%
Energy	4.2%	4.5%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.1%
Utilities	2.9%	8.1%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.7%

Return for Risk

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRDG.L

JRDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
JRDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JRDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
JRDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
JRDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

XDEB.L

XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRDG.L	XDEB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	0.33	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	0.54	+3.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.06	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	0.41	+3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.26	1.14	+15.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDG.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRDG.L	XDEB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	0.33	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.78	+0.16

Drawdowns

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.L drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDG.L and XDEB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRDG.L	XDEB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-19.61%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-6.39%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.59%	-8.47%	-10.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-3.52%	+3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-3.50%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.32%	-0.71%

Volatility

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) is 2.43%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that JRDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRDG.L	XDEB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.43%	2.66%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	5.97%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.04%	7.97%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.43%	9.68%	+3.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.43%	11.52%	+1.91%

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JRDG.L and XDEB.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JRDG.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

JRDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JRDG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)	1.03%	0.99%	1.01%	0.94%	1.43%
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRDG.L and XDEB.L in my portfolio?

JRDG.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JRDG.L or XDEB.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRDG.L or XDEB.L?

JRDG.L and XDEB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between JRDG.L and XDEB.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS.