PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JRDG.L having a 9.68% return and JGRE.L slightly lower at 9.61%.


JRDG.L

1D
0.17%
1M
3.34%
YTD
9.68%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10Y*

JGRE.L

1D
0.12%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.61%
6M
9.59%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
9.68%11.47%20.63%18.78%-7.76%7.99%
JGRE.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.61%11.65%20.63%18.59%-7.77%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JRDG.L and JGRE.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.99

The correlation between JRDG.L and JGRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRDG.L
JGRE.L

Technology

28.6%
28.6%

Financial Services

15.4%
15.4%

Industrials

11.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.1%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.9%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

JRDG.L
28.6%
JGRE.L
28.6%

Financial Services

JRDG.L
15.4%
JGRE.L
15.4%

Industrials

JRDG.L
11.3%
JGRE.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JRDG.L
10.1%
JGRE.L
10.1%

Communication Services

JRDG.L
9.1%
JGRE.L
9.1%

Healthcare

JRDG.L
8.9%
JGRE.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

JRDG.L
4.6%
JGRE.L
4.6%

Energy

JRDG.L
4.2%
JGRE.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

JRDG.L
3.2%
JGRE.L
3.2%

Utilities

JRDG.L
2.9%
JGRE.L
2.9%

Real Estate

JRDG.L
1.7%
JGRE.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRDG.L
JRDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JGRE.L
JGRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRDG.LJGRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.93

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.26

16.25

+0.02

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDG.L and JGRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRDG.LJGRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.92

+0.02

Drawdowns

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum JGRE.L drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDG.L and JGRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRDG.LJGRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-25.31%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-6.65%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-18.49%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.17%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-3.10%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.61%

0.00%

Volatility

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRDG.LJGRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.48%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.20%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

10.12%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

13.16%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

15.06%

-1.63%

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JRDG.L and JGRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRDG.L vs. JGRE.L - Dividend Comparison

JRDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while JGRE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JRDG.L and JGRE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRDG.L and JGRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRDG.L and JGRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer