PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRDG.L vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRDG.L is traded in GBp, while JEPQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPQ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRDG.L achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.19% return.


JRDG.L

1D
0.17%
1M
3.34%
YTD
9.68%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-2.40%
1M
1.98%
YTD
7.19%
6M
5.82%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
9.68%11.47%20.63%18.78%-1.54%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.19%6.97%27.03%29.47%-9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JRDG.L and JEPQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.56

The correlation between JRDG.L and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRDG.L
JEPQ

Technology

28.6%
54.0%

Financial Services

15.4%
0.4%

Industrials

11.3%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
15.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.1%

Energy

4.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.0%

Utilities

2.9%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.2%

Technology

JRDG.L
28.6%
JEPQ
54.0%

Financial Services

JRDG.L
15.4%
JEPQ
0.4%

Industrials

JRDG.L
11.3%
JEPQ
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JRDG.L
10.1%
JEPQ
12.8%

Communication Services

JRDG.L
9.1%
JEPQ
15.4%

Healthcare

JRDG.L
8.9%
JEPQ
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

JRDG.L
4.6%
JEPQ
7.1%

Energy

JRDG.L
4.2%
JEPQ
0.4%

Basic Materials

JRDG.L
3.2%
JEPQ
1.0%

Utilities

JRDG.L
2.9%
JEPQ
1.3%

Real Estate

JRDG.L
1.7%
JEPQ
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRDG.L
JRDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRDG.LJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.45

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.55

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.26

18.25

-1.99

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDG.L and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRDG.LJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.31

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.89

+0.05

Drawdowns

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDG.L and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRDG.LJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-22.33%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-6.04%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-22.33%

+3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.55%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-4.07%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.50%

+0.11%

Volatility

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) is 2.43%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that JRDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRDG.LJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.14%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

8.65%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

11.90%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

15.96%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

15.96%

-2.53%

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRDG.L vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

JRDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than JEPQ's 10.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.39%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
1.03%0.99%1.01%0.94%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRDG.L and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

JRDG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. JRDG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRDG.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRDG.L and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer