PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
JRDG.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JRDG.L (JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JRDG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRDG.L returned 17.10%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for INFR.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRDG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JRDG.L having a 9.68% return and INFR.L slightly lower at 9.52%.

JRDG.L

1D
0.17%
1M
3.34%
YTD
9.68%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.40%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)		9.68%11.47%20.63%18.78%-7.76%7.99%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JRDG.L and INFR.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between JRDG.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
JRDG.L
INFR.L

Technology

28.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

15.4%
0.0%

Industrials

11.3%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Communication Services

9.1%
1.0%

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

4.2%
16.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.9%
56.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
5.0%

Technology

JRDG.L
28.6%
INFR.L
0.7%

Financial Services

JRDG.L
15.4%
INFR.L
0.0%

Industrials

JRDG.L
11.3%
INFR.L
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JRDG.L
10.1%
INFR.L

-

Communication Services

JRDG.L
9.1%
INFR.L
1.0%

Healthcare

JRDG.L
8.9%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

JRDG.L
4.6%
INFR.L

-

Energy

JRDG.L
4.2%
INFR.L
16.4%

Basic Materials

JRDG.L
3.2%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

JRDG.L
2.9%
INFR.L
56.0%

Real Estate

JRDG.L
1.7%
INFR.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with JRDG.L:
JRDG.L vs. JEGP.LJRDG.L vs. IISU.LJRDG.L vs. JGGI.LJRDG.L vs. HMWO.LJRDG.L vs. VEVE.LJRDG.L vs. GGRP.LJRDG.L vs. VWRL.L
Often compared with INFR.L:
INFR.L vs. DPGT.LINFR.L vs. IWDA.LINFR.L vs. IUIT.LINFR.L vs. ARCK.LINFR.L vs. IDWR.LINFR.L vs. FWRG.LINFR.L vs. WUTI.L

Return for Risk

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
JRDG.L
JRDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

JRDG.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.61
1.55

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.59
2.19

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.27

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.13

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.26

7.96

+8.31

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDG.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

JRDG.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.55

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.62

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.61

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.52

+0.42

Drawdowns

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDG.L and INFR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

JRDG.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-34.25%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-5.19%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-11.08%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.75%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-3.70%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-6.12%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.04%

-0.43%

Volatility

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) is 2.43%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that JRDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

JRDG.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.92%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

8.92%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

10.49%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

12.26%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.10%

-0.67%

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRDG.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

JRDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than INFR.L's 2.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)		1.03%0.99%1.01%0.94%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

JRDG.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

JRDG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. JRDG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRDG.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRDG.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer