PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRBEX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2030 Fund (JRBEX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRBEX achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.09% return.


JRBEX

1D
1.11%
1M
-0.58%
6M
4.48%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
14.45%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
8.04%
ALL TIME*
7.94%

PADLX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.35%
6M
2.77%
YTD
4.09%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JRBEX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2030 Fund
6.60%15.33%7.14%18.28%-16.36%11.63%11.91%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.09%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JRBEX and PADLX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.90

The correlation between JRBEX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRBEX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JRBEX
JRBEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JRBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JRBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2030 Fund (JRBEX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRBEXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.75

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

11.56

-2.13

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRBEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRBEX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRBEX drawdown since its inception was -25.15%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRBEX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRBEXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-18.87%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-3.63%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.58%

-6.63%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.21%

-18.87%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.79%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-4.73%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.86%

+0.59%

Volatility

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2030 Fund (JRBEX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.44%. This indicates that JRBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRBEXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

1.44%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

4.03%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.42%

4.89%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

6.70%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

7.47%

+3.58%

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRBEX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRBEX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

JRBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than PADLX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRBEX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.87%3.06%2.86%2.47%1.94%5.57%2.51%3.19%6.01%1.99%2.09%2.09%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.65%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JRBEX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRBEX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to PADLX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRBEX dropped -25.15% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRBEX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer