JPTBX vs. PDAHX
JPTBX (JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund) and PDAHX (Prudential Day One Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, JPTBX returned 9.40%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for PDAHX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JPTBX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PDAHX.
Performance
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPTBX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than PDAHX's 5.04% return.
JPTBX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.07%
PDAHX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPTBX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund | 11.03% | 20.02% | 11.95% | 22.09% | -17.76% | 17.54% | 12.93% | 24.57% | -8.62% | 20.15% |
PDAHX Prudential Day One Income Fund | 5.04% | 10.37% | 8.27% | 8.89% | -11.69% | 9.21% | 8.22% | 13.58% | -3.26% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPTBX and PDAHX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between JPTBX and PDAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPTBX vs. PDAHX — Risk / Return Rank
JPTBX
PDAHX
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) and Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPTBX | PDAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 2.74 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 12.51 | -2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPTBX drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, which is greater than PDAHX's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTBX and PDAHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPTBX | PDAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -15.65% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -3.51% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -5.08% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -15.65% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.36% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -2.63% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 0.77% | +1.32% |
Volatility
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX) at 1.20%. This indicates that JPTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPTBX | PDAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 1.20% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 3.79% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 4.66% | +8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 6.58% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 6.36% | +9.20% |
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPTBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than PDAHX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPTBX vs. PDAHX - Dividend Comparison
JPTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than PDAHX's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPTBX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund | 2.00% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 1.61% | 5.17% | 1.14% | 2.30% | 4.95% | 1.90% | 2.03% | 1.99% |
PDAHX Prudential Day One Income Fund | 4.85% | 4.92% | 7.35% | 3.54% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 2.22% | 4.25% | 3.70% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPTBX and PDAHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPTBX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to PDAHX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPTBX dropped -32.64% vs PDAHX's -15.65%.
PDAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPTBX and PDAHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer