PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPTBX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPTBX achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 13.45% return.


JPTBX

1D
-0.67%
1M
3.38%
YTD
11.60%
6M
12.09%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
11.15%

FDFPX

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.78%
YTD
13.45%
6M
14.82%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPTBX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund
11.60%20.02%11.95%22.09%-17.76%17.54%12.93%8.50%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
13.45%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JPTBX and FDFPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JPTBX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPTBX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPTBX
JPTBX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JPTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JPTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPTBXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.22

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

14.27

-0.85

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPTBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPTBX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPTBXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.44

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.73

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.81

-0.10

Drawdowns

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPTBX drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTBX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPTBXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.64%

-31.22%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-9.54%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-15.42%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-27.41%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.58%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.85%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.15%

-0.13%

Volatility

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) is 3.67%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that JPTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPTBXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.17%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

10.33%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

12.58%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

15.09%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

17.18%

-1.62%

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPTBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPTBX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

JPTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than FDFPX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.77%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPTBX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund
1.99%2.22%1.95%1.83%1.61%5.17%1.14%2.30%4.95%1.90%2.03%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JPTBX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to JPTBX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPTBX dropped -32.64% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPTBX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer