PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. VNLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 2.08% return.


JPST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.99%

VNLA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.63%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$275.20M$274.89M$316.70M
$19.97M$17.51M$18.61M

JPST vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.95%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
2.08%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.17%-0.18%3.01%4.43%0.02%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and VNLA is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.34

Over the past year, JPST and VNLA have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPST vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSTVNLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.60

3.30

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.70

10.46

+17.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

131.07

53.53

+77.55

JPST vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 7.56, which is comparable to the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPST vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum VNLA drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and VNLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTVNLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.49%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-0.43%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-0.49%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

-1.76%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.23%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.08%

-0.05%

Volatility

JPST vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.13%, while Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) has a volatility of 0.17%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTVNLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.17%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

0.50%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55%

0.64%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

1.04%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

1.42%

-0.49%

JPST vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPST vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than VNLA's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.22%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%0.00%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
5.16%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and VNLA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNLA has higher volatility (0.17%) compared to JPST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.92% vs 3.71% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 4.22% for JPST.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.23% for VNLA.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.56 vs 7.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and VNLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer